Talk:Longevity claims

Mariam Amash was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 September 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Longevity claims. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Bernando LaPallo was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 September 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Longevity claims. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Longevity B‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Index 1, 2

Remove Zhang Daoling[edit]

He lived nearly 2,000 years ago. Unless I'm mistaken, the preferred place to put those people is Longevity myths, specifically Longevity myths#China. 🇺🇦 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 12:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done, though mainly because there is no justification for the specific dates of birth and death listed as these do not occur in his article. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 22:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eşe Gelebek[edit]

Eşe Gelebek died: [1] Valentin Ko (talk) 07:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Manuel Garcia Hernandez died on 12 October 2023[edit]

Hello, I wanted to inform you about the death of Manuel Garcia Hernandez, I spoke with his daughter a few hours ago and she told me that he had died on 13 October 2023. 2806:101E:A:8B9C:5DF6:5430:61EF:7DF1 (talk) 01:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hearsay is insufficient. Must have a reliable source that is accessible to other editors, confirming that he has died. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 01:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02xdJUKEoATThKtitYWsn6iyqSxQn57cdVgxwMA3pMoUCKM44LDR8iwrjHh5eavAXbl&id=61550855982199&mibextid=Nif5oz 2806:101E:A:8B9C:5DF6:5430:61EF:7DF1 (talk) 01:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Facebook is not a reliable source. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 02:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes it is. 2806:101E:A:8B9C:5DF6:5430:61EF:7DF1 (talk) 02:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Facebook is a reliable source. Manuel Uribe Gar (talk) 01:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Facebook is generally not considered a reliable source on English Wikipedia because it is user generated content. As per WP:FACEBOOK, there is only one instance in which Facebook can be considered As a reliable source:

Sometimes. The official page of a subject may be used as a self-published, primary source, but only if it can be authenticated as belonging to the subject. Peaceray (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]